The Petnuptial May be a "Purrfect" Solution for Marrying (and potentially divorcing) Pet Parents

        So it has been a few weeks since I posted my blog  that (shocker) pets are not people in the eyes of Florida courts. If you’ve spent any time contemplating that revelation then here is something to contemplate… a pet nuptial agreement.   Created in the United Kingdom by a pet charity known as Blue Cross (not to be confused by the U.S. insurance behemoth by the same name, though , admittedly, some people who have had that insurance probably feel like they’ve gone to a vet for treatment rather than a doctor), Petnups ( a purrrfect name)offers a download that covers ownership, responsibilities and rights if the human relationship goes sour.  This is pretty new wave considering that until a landmark case in 2010, the UK did not even recognize people prenups as binding.

       
        The document combines contracts for deeds of agreement (think-buying a car with a loan),  divorce settlements and consent orders in an attempt to make the Petnup a legally binding document.  Clearly, there is a need for such a document. Researchers found that  30 percent of divorcing couples  disputed ongoing pet care.  Bones of contention included who would pay for veterinary bills, availability for grooming, vacation and holiday plans and how long the pet should be left alone (sounds just like the issues with kids). According to Blue Cross, pets are often given up to shelters during a divorce when neither party wants nor can care for the pet after the breakup.

                The former chairman of the American Bar association Animal Law Committee, Rebecca Hass (a law professor at Valparaiso University who, perhaps in the lofty stacks of academia, has more time to contemplate and research this than a lowly lawyer in a tiny firm), was quoted in the January 2015 ABA Journal as saying the Petnup is a good idea, though it remains unclear as to whether a court would enforce it, especially as it concerns visitation and shared custody (or, as we might, in keeping with current child law, call it in Florida a Pet- time sharing and Pet-parenting plan).

            At the end of the day, if you are really as attached to your pet as your kids, (or perhaps even more so- at least pets greet you when you come home) it comes down to what is really going to be best for the pet.  If you want to keep the cat just because your soon-to-be ex loves it more than you, is that a good reason to fight for a cat you never liked? ( hint-no).  On the other hand, if you have a well adjusted pet who can easily adapt to changes well, maybe an agreement to time share makes sense.  And while you’re at it, you might think about what is going to happen to your pet if you die.  Trust and estate lawyers frequently include pet provisions in wills and trust.   Afterall, the late irate hotel magnate Leona Helmsley left her Maltese, Trouble, $2 million!  Now that was a lucky dog.[i]


Cindy Vova
www.vovalaw.com

---

[i] Poor Trouble left  for the Rainbow Bridge in 2011, leaving, thankfully, the remainder of his unused largess to children’s charities.www.vovalaw.com

Pets Aren't People Too...According to Florida Law

 

          Our dog celebrated her 9^th birthday on December 31^st, and reluctantly, I must admit that with each passing year I have to acknowledge that she is more and more an integral part of our family.  Let’s face it, you know when your daughters are away at college and their texts consist of requests for daily videos and photos of our beloved Maltese…you know the dog is the third child we didn’t have.    I know I am not alone.  Statistics put the dollar volume that people spend on their pets at nearly $60 billion (and yes, that is BILLION) each year. For years Hallmark has cashed in on the bond between pets and people with animal sympathy cards when our pets go to the Rainbow Bridge. 

            
         So what happens when a family splits up?  Well, I know all too well the sometimes practical and sometimes prehistoric ways that parents deal with time sharing and parent plans plans (no more “custody” please in Florida…that smacks of the kids being objects rather than living, breathing humans) when it comes to their children.   But what about the family pet?  Let’s start with the law.  Florida does not provide for custody, timesharing, visitation or any other terminology you might come up with as it pertains to pets…be they fish or fowl, canine or cat.  Nope, as far as the Sunshine State is concerned, Fido is classified the same as the furniture.  In other words, the pet becomes part of equitable distribution…splitting up the property.  Just as divorcing folks do not have time sharing with the family room couch, courts give one party the sofa and, presumably the value of that now used couch is offset against another assets.  So it is  with the family pet.  If kitty was rescued from a shelter and you originally paid a $50 adoption fee, then theoretically, your spouse gets a $50 asset from the other marital property to ‘balance” the equation. Forget the fact that this pet has provided love and affection and there is no price that could substitute for her rubbing up against you when you get home each day (yeah, I have two cats as well), the law just doesn’t see it that way.  Moreover, if Fifi was from a champion bloodline and you laid out $5000 for that pet, then your spouse gets an offsets somewhere in other property for that $5000 if you keep the dog.

                What about if you are the registered owner of the pet?  Well, if the pet we purchased during the marriage then (with certain limited exceptions) it is marital property subject to equitable distribution, so the title to the dog does not really resolve the issues.  Now, will a judge, as a person (and maybe a pet owner too) take that into account?  Perhaps, but it is unlikely to appear as the rationale for the distribution in the final judgment.

                Of course, if you are a couple who never married, then the fact that the pet is registered to you and you have “title” to the animal more than likely will carry the day.

                So is there a way to work this out?  Yes, as there is always a way to work things out in family law without a court’s intervention.  The real questions becomes, do the parties want to do that?

            In my next blog I will show you one way to deal with “custody” of the pets that, quite candidly, I wish I’d thought of.  Still, it is worth sharing with all the rest of the pet lovers out there.

Read my other blogs and find out more about how the Law Firm of Cindy S. Vova, P.A. can assist you with your family law concerns.  Go to our website:  
www.vovalaw.com

Looking on the Bright Side...Divorce Aphorism for the Day

   Almost daily I find myself listening to a client who is having a difficult time dealing with the loss that inevitably accompanies a divorce.  In trying to comfort these clients, I sometimes find myself also at a loss in finding the right words of consolation.
   So, my search lead me to words from, perhaps an unlikely source, but nonetheless, these are the words of the beautiful Eva Longoria who, in spite of her gorgeous appearance, professional and financial success, also knows the pain of love loss, but approaches it with a healthy view.  Here goes:
                 "One thing I did learn is you don't hold on to the bitterness of the loss;
                    you hand on to the beauty of the love." 


    What a wonderful was to move on.


    More divorce aphorisms to come in the future.






See more on my websitewww.vovalaw.com


  

Why If Florida Same Sex Couples Marry in Haste They May Repent in Leisure

    

                 FINALLY!!!!  Barring any legal maneuvering that is not anticipated, same sex couples will be able to “tie the knot” once the clerks of Florida’s counties begin issuing marriage licenses. 

                Just for a brief legal background (if you are interested) a number of circuit court judges throughout the state had already ruled that Florida’s law banning gay marriages was unconstitutional. These judges include Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Sarah Zabel, who last July ruled in favor of six same-sex couples who sued a year ago to have the Miami-Dade Clerk issues them marriage licenses, and Broward Circuit Court Judge Dale Cohen, who ruled in August that Florida’s gay marriage ban was unconstitutional, and last month granted the first divorce to a Florida same sex couple who were married in another state.   However, a series of legal maneuvers stayed (legal for “stopped”) the judges’ ruling from actually taking effect pending a ruling from Federal Judge Robert Hinkle.  Although Judge Hinkle had already ruled Florida’s ban unconstitutional, he stayed (again) that ruling from taking effect until the state of Florida had exhausted its right to appeal the decision.

                According to Judge Hinkle, time’s up, and all clerks may issues marriage licenses to same sex couples as of 12:00 midnight on Tuesday, January 6, 2015. Media reports indicate that certain clerks’ offices and other authorities plan to preside over large same sex weddings that very same day…some as early as 3:00 a.m.!

                Now here’s the rub.  I know these ruling are long past due, and same sex couples are eager to share in the same benefits that married heterosexual couples enjoy.  But what these anxious couples may not be considering is that, in spite of the many benefits of marriage, so too are there enormous burdens.  Someone once told me that one who marries in haste repents in leisure.  Ask anyone who has gone through a divorce, and I think they will agree

                 Fortunately, even among the six couples who sued last year in Miami-Dade, according to an article in the Sun Sentinel, only one couple plans to move quickly and marry.   

                So, what does time give to these couples who have been legally barred from enjoying wedded bliss?  Well, it gives them time to consider a prenuptial agreement.  If you review some of my previous blogs about prenuptial agreements, you will see that they do not only address the “what ifs” of divorce, but many other issues that, if discussed and resolved in advance, may help create a happier union.

              Over my next series of blogs, I will point out many of those potential burdens and why a prenuptial agreement may be the first thing to plan before the wedding.   It will be worth the wait!


    The Law Office of Cindy S. Vova, P.A. in  Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, provides compassionate and caring legal advice to all  families we represent.  We welcome all the new "legal" families to Florida and look forward to serving you.  Please see our website by clicking the attached link to learn more about our firm. 
     www.vovalaw.com

T'was the Night Before Christmas...look who shows up this time!

     In keeping with the holiday season, I thought I'd use a little artistic license in reworking Clement Clarke Moore's poem, that, by the way, is actually originally titled "A Visit from St. Nicholas." This was originally penned for a business group I attend, but, at my staff's urging, I've incorporated it as my latest blog.  Although clearly meant to elicit a smile, there is a message in it that transcends the holidays….divorce can be peaceful.  I hope that's one holiday message you take to heart!


T'was the night before X-Mas and all through the house,
There was a lot of fighting among many a spouse.


Momma was locked in a fearful stare
Hoping the police soon would be there.


The children were nestled all snug in their bed,
While dad threw something at momma's head.


For the Jews it was a latka, for the Christian it was beer,
That was their meaning of holiday cheer.


When out from the roof they heard a great clatter
Why it's family law atty Cindy Vova arriving and looking much fatter.


Quicker than "briefs" her staff they came
As she whistled and shouted and called them by name:


On Vicki and Helvi and of course Helena
We gotta fix this before things get any "meana"


With a briefcase full of books and memos of law
I listened as she read the list of them all:


Injunction, alimony and equitable distribution,
child support a parenting plan...I have a solution.


Yes the resolution to your marital consternation
Is to send you both quickly to mediation!


And all of the sudden on that X-Mas eve
Those two realized they could settle before she would leave


And as quick as she came, she fled from the site.
Merry X-mas Happy Hanukkah to all and to all a good night


Amazed the couple watched as she continued with her journey
And all they could say is "that's one hell of an attorney!"


Whatever your beliefs, however you celebrate, on behalf of my office, I wish everyone peace, prosperity and happiness in the new year!


www.vovalaw.com

Cohabitation Agreements-The Gap Between No Commitment and Marriage

 

                One of the first things I ask when meeting with a new client contemplating divorce is the date of marriage.  What I often hear in response is, “Well we’ve been married ___ years (fill in the blank, it is usually under five) but we lived together for 10 years (or fill in the blank) before that.

                So I’m thinking, thanks for the information, but as it pertains to your rights and responsibilities in a divorce in Florida, it is not really relevant. You see, Florida is not one of the states that recognize common law marriage, at least not since 1968, when it was outlawed.[1]  Common law marriage, in those states that still recognize it,[2] essentially establishes that a man and woman who lived together and, for all intents and purposes, held themselves out as husband and wife, for a certain number of years (requirements vary by state) are deemed married as if they went through the legal formalities associated with nuptials.

                Well, let’s suppose that you are one of those folks who live in a committed (we hope) relationship but one or both of you do not wish to get that “piece of paper.”  Fair enough, but since you don’t want to even see the end of the (marriage) aisle, you probably are not looking down the real road either.  Here’s my suggestion….take a look.  And here’s my solution: a cohabitation agreement. 

                “What’s a ‘cohabitation agreement?’” you ask.  Glad you inquired.  Essentially, a cohabitation agreement, also sometimes referred to as a “domestic partnership agreement,” is a binding contract between two people that sets forth rights and obligations of the partners, particularly if there is a break-up down that proverbial road.  And while we are at it, these agreements are not only for a man and women living together, but also for (and more commonly used by) same sex couples who (don’t get me started) are still unable to legally marry in many (Florida) states.

                Some of the issues that can be addressed in a cohabitation agreement are:

                -division of joint debts, regardless of whose name the debt was incurred

                -who keeps the apartment lease, or the house purchased in only one name (but paid for  by the other or both)

                -who keeps (and pays for the car) that is jointly titled

                -what happens to the pets

                -does the inferior earning partner get any financial assistance if the couple splits (or just a swift kick out the front door-don’t laugh, I’ve seen it happen and without this agreement there is      typically no legal remedy)             

      Such an agreement may also include preparation of a health care surrogate form giving legal authority to one’s partner to make medical decisions on the other’s behalf in the event of an emergency, because, guess what, without it, no matter how many years you’ve lived as a couple, the partner has no legal right to do so.

   Some Florida counties, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach included, permit couples to register as domestic partners by filling out a simple form and filing it in the county of residency.  You can find Broward’s registry form at: http://www.broward.org/RECORDSTAXESTREASURY/RECORDS/Pages/DomesticPartnershipInformation.aspx

However, as of March 2013, 60 Florida counties had no domestic partnership registry.  Even with the registry, absent a well crafted document by a knowledgeable family law attorney, some of the other areas addressed above are, well, still not addressed.

                So, if two people care enough about each other to be together day in and day out, they should care enough about each other to commit enough to put a few things down on paper.  And if not….maybe it’s time to get out now, before it’s too late.

 

---

[1] If you’re really interested (and have nothing else to keep you entertained, here’s a link for a list of states that recognize common law marriage or some derivation of it:  http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/common-law-marriage.aspx

[2] it may be relevant if the parties had a lawful common law marriage in a state that recognizes common law marriage and then moved to Florida and wanted to divorce, but I digress)

Want to find out more about "non-marriage options" Visit our website at www.vovalaw.com

Happy Holidays from Florida Law. The Gift that Keeps on Giving!!

  With the holiday season in full swing (yes, we all saw the Christmas displays in the department stores BEFORE Halloween), most of us are busy trying to get our shopping done, and find just the right gift for those on our list. So, when I read a recent case, I couldn’t help but think that this husband found the perfect gift. Not only could his wife (now ex wife) not take it back or exchange it, but she could re-gift it over and over and over.


  The case, recently decided by 4 District Court of Appeals is Kohl v. Koh.  Mrs. Kohl filed for divorce and also filed for damages resulting from assault by way of the transmission of HPV.


   The trial court, and thereafter, the appellate court dismissed Mrs. Kohl’s request for damages from the sexually transmitted disease. Notwithstanding that Mrs. Kohl alleged that her (now ex) husband "engaged in extra-marital affairs and hired multiple prostitutes and escorts during the course of their marriage," that just was not enough to pursue a suit against him.


   In fairness to the trial judge and the 4th District Court judges, they were only following Florida law (which…shout out there—that’s what the judges are supposed to do.) The law of this fair state requires that a party asking a court to recover damages as a result of getting a sexually transmitted disease from anyone (not just a spouse) must allege that the offending individual had actual knowledge that he/she "was infected with one of the sexual diseases set forth in Section 384.24, Florida Statute," and he/she "was informed that the disease could be communicated through sexual intercourse."


  So, apparently, when Mrs. Kohl found out her husband was fooling around, before she slept with her husband, she had a duty to inquire 1) whether he had knowledge he was infected with an STD and 2) whether he had he been informed that he could pass this on as the gift that keeps on giving.


  Because, I am sure that anytime one uses an escort service the first thing the escort tells her "customer" is that she has an STD, and thereafter, rather than fleeing, the customer then responds, "Oh, well, could you tell me whether your STD can be passed on to me and my wife back at home?" Are YOU kidding?


  Interestingly, the way the statute is drafted, it seems that a spouse (and, actually, anyone engaging in sex with another) would have a duty to inquire each and every time he/she engages in sex with his/her spouse because, if not, then the burden is on the gift recipient to allege (and later prove) that his/her lying, cheating spouse knew of the infection and, further, was informed (by who?) that it was transmissible through sex. Sort of kills the romance, doesn’t it? And as for the gift that keeps on giving, maybe she should have asked for a gift card instead. Visit Our Webpage for More Information