Topical issues in divorce and family law with a bit of satire meant to create a smile for those with a sense of humor
Thursday, December 4, 2014
Happy Holidays from Florida Law. The Gift that Keeps on Giving!!
With the holiday season in full swing (yes, we all saw the Christmas displays in the department stores BEFORE Halloween), most of us are busy trying to get our shopping done, and find just the right gift for those on our list. So, when I read a recent case, I couldn’t help but think that this husband found the perfect gift. Not only could his wife (now ex wife) not take it back or exchange it, but she could re-gift it over and over and over.
The case, recently decided by 4 District Court of Appeals is Kohl v. Koh. Mrs. Kohl filed for divorce and also filed for damages resulting from assault by way of the transmission of HPV.
The trial court, and thereafter, the appellate court dismissed Mrs. Kohl’s request for damages from the sexually transmitted disease. Notwithstanding that Mrs. Kohl alleged that her (now ex) husband "engaged in extra-marital affairs and hired multiple prostitutes and escorts during the course of their marriage," that just was not enough to pursue a suit against him.
In fairness to the trial judge and the 4th District Court judges, they were only following Florida law (which…shout out there—that’s what the judges are supposed to do.) The law of this fair state requires that a party asking a court to recover damages as a result of getting a sexually transmitted disease from anyone (not just a spouse) must allege that the offending individual had actual knowledge that he/she "was infected with one of the sexual diseases set forth in Section 384.24, Florida Statute," and he/she "was informed that the disease could be communicated through sexual intercourse."
So, apparently, when Mrs. Kohl found out her husband was fooling around, before she slept with her husband, she had a duty to inquire 1) whether he had knowledge he was infected with an STD and 2) whether he had he been informed that he could pass this on as the gift that keeps on giving.
Because, I am sure that anytime one uses an escort service the first thing the escort tells her "customer" is that she has an STD, and thereafter, rather than fleeing, the customer then responds, "Oh, well, could you tell me whether your STD can be passed on to me and my wife back at home?" Are YOU kidding?
Interestingly, the way the statute is drafted, it seems that a spouse (and, actually, anyone engaging in sex with another) would have a duty to inquire each and every time he/she engages in sex with his/her spouse because, if not, then the burden is on the gift recipient to allege (and later prove) that his/her lying, cheating spouse knew of the infection and, further, was informed (by who?) that it was transmissible through sex. Sort of kills the romance, doesn’t it? And as for the gift that keeps on giving, maybe she should have asked for a gift card instead. Visit Our Webpage for More Information
Sunday, November 23, 2014
The Last Five of the Top 10 Things to Consider before Filing for Divorce
So, I
know you’ve been at the edge of your seat waiting to find out what the bottom
five of the top 10 things are to consider before filing for divorce. Here, for your contemplation, is the rest of
the list.
6. Get organized. Surely, this helpful tip should not be
confined to people considering divorce.
This is just good life advice. However, as this applies to divorce, this
means getting all of your financial documents in order including pay stubs, tax
returns, bank statements, brokerage account statements, information regarding
real estate, credit card bills, loans, including mortgages, etc. Now, if you do not know where to find these
(because, as I often hear, “my spouse took care of all of this,”) now might be
a good time to either “look harder” or ask some questions. If your spouse asks
why, all of the sudden, you want this information, you can gently inform
him/her that if he/she died tomorrow you’d not even know where to begin to look.
(That person may advise that he/she has no intention of dying any time soon,
and you might gently persuade them otherwise). If you have a family accountant, you can also
contact this person because, if you file joint taxes, that accountant is also your
accountant and he/she has an obligation to provide you (the client) with
information. Equally as important is
organizing the information for your attorney. Our office is happy to do it for
you, but the more of the “easier” stuff you can do, the more time we have to do
the “hard’ stuff, and that’s why you are hiring us to being with.
7. Close joint accounts. Okay, so that’s why these tips originally
came from the financial analysts and not the attorneys. There are times when this is good advice. However, it all depends on the circumstances
and the best thing to do is, in advance of taking this action, speak with a
family law attorney so you can give the attorney all the facts of your
particular situation and the attorney can give you sound legal advice.
8. How’s your credit? Do you even know? Once yearly you can obtain, free of charge,
your credit report from Experian, Equifax and Transunion, the three major
credit reporting agencies. If it’s not-so-good, you might want to try to
improve that before the divorce. Once
divorced, without good credit, it may be difficult to rent an apartment, obtain
a credit card or, among others, get a car loan.
Bring your credit reports with
you when you go to an initial consultation with an attorney. If you don’t have a credit card in your own
name, try getting one now before you file, even if the credit line is small.
9. Hire the right team. I LIKE the advice from the Institute on this
one. “Your attorney is not your
therapist, and it will become very costly for you if you treat them this way.” I
truly believe I practice family law with a heart. However, I have a BBA, an MBA
and JD, NOT a PhD in psychology (not even an undergrad minor). So although I care deeply about all of my
clients, any therapeutic advice I give is solely from my years of hearing
stories and not from any formal training.
Now on the other hand, in hiring the right legal team, don’t always look
for the meanest and “sharkiest.” Time is money and the more you spend on vengeful
fighting, the less you end up with and the more your attorney takes, (and yes, P.S,
I’m still in the same house after 21 years, so that’s obviously not happening in
my office) See, I can give some good therapeutic advice, after all.
10. Take time for you. Advice we should all live by. And with that said, I’m off to the gym.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
DIVORCE CORP....THE CONFERENCE THIS WEEKEND!
So, it’s been quite a few months since my blog about Divorce
Corp., The Movie. It seems, however,
that this documentary, which has done for the practice of divorce law what Reefer Madness did for marijuana, was
such an astounding hit that the film’s director has found a way to continue
profiting from the documentary’s success.
Indeed, ladies and gentlemen (but
let’s face it, mostly gentlemen), this coming weekend you have the opportunity
to attend the Divorce Corp. conference in Alexandria, Virginia, just a stone’s
throw across the Potomac to our nation’s capital.
Yes, starting this coming
Saturday, November 15th, through Sunday, November 16th,
you and like-minded concerned citizens can, for the low price of $199.00[i]
can hear seminars on the following (and I took this from the website)
topics
|
·
Child Support – Who Benefits?
·
The Constitutional rights of Parents
·
Do Our Family Laws Reconcile With Modern Social Trends?
·
The Impact of Domestic Violence and Parental Alienation on
Custody
·
Mediation vs. Litigation for Family Law Matters
·
Are Family Courts the New Mafia?
|
·
RICO Suits Against the State Courts
·
Equal Parenting
·
The Science Behind Primary vs. Shared Custody
·
Alimony Reform Success
·
Revising Child Support Guidelines
·
Judicial Elections and Their Impact on Judicial Independence
|
I would
particularly like to hear the seminar on “Are Family Courts the New
Mafia.” I mean, heck, in Broward County,
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida we only have one Italian family law judge so what’s
up? I would also like to hear the “RICO
Suits Against the State Courts” seminar.
“RICO” stands for Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations" Act, a
law designed to invoke criminal penalties
as well as a civil cause of action against entities engaged in ongoing
criminal enterprises. Hey, are they
picking on the Italian judges again?
Well, there’s
still time to register. I bet they’ll
even take walk-ins. It’s at the Westin
Alexandria, located at (I’m not making this up) 400 Courthouse Square. How fitting.
Seriously,
our entire legal system is living and breathing. Otherwise, how do we, in modern society, base
our laws on a document that is over 230 years old? I do not believe that the family law courts
are immune from the need for some changes as well. But, as with anything else, when the changes
are pushed from vigilantes, the changes are never designed to serve all people.
I hope the
attendees get something towards positive changes. From the seminar topics I have my doubts. One thing, their wallets will be at least
$199 lighter. But this IS America, and
everyone is entitled to make a living, even lawyers.
As for me,
I’ll be at the University of Florida visiting my daughter and watching the Gators play the South
Carolina Gamecocks (nice name).
[i] It
was $99 before September 1st…sorry-I missed the update
Learn more about the Law Offices of Cindy S. Vova, P.A.
A Family Law Firm with a Heart
Visit our website:
Sunday, November 9, 2014
TOP 10 THINGS TO CONSIDER BEFORE FILING FOR DIVORCE(But this Blog has Only the First Five)
As a family law attorney who has now been admitted to the Georgia
and Florida Bars for over 30 years (!), I managed to, unwittingly, get on what
seems to be every mailing list relating to divorce and family. So when I received the Financial Analyst¸ published by the Institute for Divorce Financial
Analysts, I was drawn to an article entitled Ten Things to Consider Before Filing for Divorce.
Here, ladies
and gentlemen, are the first “five things” to consider, per that article, with
my “spin” on them. You’ll have to wait
for the follow up blog for the next five:
- Are you sure? You darn well better be, because this is playing for not keeps in this game. The first thing I ask prospective clients (unless they are subject to mental or physical domestic violence…in which case I say run!) is whether they tried counseling. In their best case, they are able to work things out with their spouses and I lose a client (in which case they hopefully send me a neighbor who can’t work it out), and in the worst case, five years after the divorce they won’t ponder if they did everything to save the marriage and be burdened with that self doubt.
- Do your research. If this means checking up on an attorney you are contemplating hiring, by all means. If this means asking for free consultations with ten attorneys, please don’t call my office. As an attorney, the only “thing” I have to sell you is my time and knowledge. As such, please do not expect an attorney to give you all the free advice you need to become a “do it yourselfer.” Go to Home Depot for that. Second, if your “research” is telling me what your friend, who is divorced, says the law is for your case, please go hire your friend as your counsel. Besides the fact that (absent if the friend is a member of the Florida Bar) the unlicensed practice of law potentially subjects a person to a civil injunction or, in more extreme cases, indirect criminal contempt, you will get what you pay for…nothing.
- Set your goals. If this means how you are going to go it alone after the divorce, yes, this is a good thing to think about. If, on the other hand, it means “how can I suck every last nickel out of my spouse, make my spouse’s life miserable, say such horrible things to my kids that they will end up hating both parents, then these are goals I will not help you achieve. Though you may be angry and/or hurt in the beginning (understandable) not only are these bad goals, but they will drain a substantial amount of money from the marital pot into the lawyers’ coffers. If you still want to do this, message me separately. I can surely provide you with a long list of my colleagues who will be more than happy to take more of your money than is necessary. I, however, am not one of those attorneys.
- Keeping the home? Yes, something you have to contemplate. I read once, and tell my clients, that you can fit as much love in a little home as you can in a big house. Don’t convince yourself that your kids need to stay in the house if financially that is not a good move. Children are much more adaptable than we think. Remember, two households (and that’s what will exist after the divorce) cannot live as economically as one household. Don’t let emotions overcome practicality. (This from one whose parents sold her house when in her first year of law school and didn’t leave forwarding address…just kidding about the latter)
- Consider custody. Yes, that’s definitely a good idea of you have children. (as opposed to putting them in foster care?) By the way, divorce law in Florida has done away with “custody.” We have “time sharing,” which is really a better description. Parents should share time, not possess a child. But really, do you want ALL the time with your children?(because you never need any “down” time for yourself and want to be responsible for them 24/7) Are you demanding more time so you can reduce your child support? (and then you will have them more and it will cost you even more to feed them) Will this “show” your soon to be ex that you are the better parent? (and where is the reality show that awards that trophy?) In other words, stop thinking about what is good for you and really take a look at what will be best for your children. Remember…your children are entitled to both a mother and a father, even if they don’t live in the same house!Hang tight….then next five will be here soon.
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
Waiting to Divorce….Don’t Die in the Interim
Sometimes, although not always, clients want to get their
divorces settled, and then wait for “a while” until the final judgment of
divorce is entered by the Court. A
myriad of reasons are offered; some that have true validity (I want to keep my
spouse on my health insurance until he gets a job that offers those benefits);
and some reasons are a little more, um, interesting (I just don’t want to get
divorced yet…okay-so the past three, five, or 15 months of litigation was just
foreplay?)
Still, unless I have a judge breathing down my neck to get a
case off of his docket, I typically tell the client, “There’s no rush on my
part…I’ll still be here when you’re ready.”
But what happens if, while the client is waiting to get the
final judgment, the client, or the client’s spouse, dies? I mean, after all, both parties entered
into a settlement agreement intending to be bound by it, didn’t they? (Of course they did that with the marriage contract too,but that's ancient history)
Oh no, my dear still married friends. Death changes everything! In fact, our very own appellate court
(at least if you live in Broward, Indian River, Okeechobee, Palm Beach, St.
Lucie or Martin Counties), in the case of Marlowe
v. Brown, 944 So2d 1036 (4th DCA 2006) said so! In Marlowe¸
the husband and wife entered into a settlement agreement where they agreed to
split all assets 50/50. An order
was entered ratifying the agreement, but, as luck would have it, the husband
died before final judgment. When
the husband’s brother, as personal representative of the brother’s estate (and
still brother-in-law of the surviving wife) tried to enforce the settlement
agreement, the court said “no way,” and the divorce was dismissed! Too bad to
that brother-likely all the assets of the deceased spouse (or at least those
left pursuant to a will or the 33% left if there is no will) went to the
almost, but not quite divorced spouse. In Topol
v Polakoff 37 FLW D1330 (4th DCA 2012), an IRA beneficiary had
already been changed, but it was voided by the subsequent death of the spouse. So
sad for the new “not” beneficiary.
So, now, I make sure, when a client who has settled the case,
wanted to wait, that I explain the potential “risk.” Sure, it is not going to happen too often, but you never
know.
I guess, at least in Florida, those marriage vows should be
amended to say “till death (or final judgment of divorce) do us
part.”
See Our Website: Law Office of CIndy S. Vova, P.A.
See Our Website: Law Office of CIndy S. Vova, P.A.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
THE WHOLE ENCHILADA, INCLUDING THE EX-WIFE
On a
recent Saturday night I decided to try a relatively new restaurant in the
Broward Mall…oh, excuse me, that’s Westfield
Broward (sorry, old habits die hard…it was only renamed about seven years
ago). The establishment is called The Whole Enchilada, a Mexican-style
casual eatery with tacos, burritos, quesadillas and, you guessed it,
enchiladas.
So
while my husband was up ordering our dinners (hey, it was the weekend…and I
needed a break), I decided to read the rest of the menu. Understand that I read anything and
everything. Yes, I was the kid who read
the cereal boxes in my youth and, as I said earlier, old habits die hard. Lo and behold, what did I find as a double
star entrée on the back page? Glad you asked, because you were probably
wondering at this point what The Whole
Enchilada has to do with a family law blog. Well, a featured menu item is none other than
THE EX-WIFE. The description, taken
verbatim, is as follows:
“Because it seemed like a good idea at the
time…”
Those willing to take on the ex-wife
challenge will have 45 minutes during one sitting to complete the entire
burrito and all of its accompaniments. If
successful-it’s free and you will receive a TWE shirt and a forever gift of
remembrance at The Whole Enchilada Fresh Mexican Grill.
The $39.99 entrée is:
A combined 6 pounds of Mexican Rice, black or
pinto beans, jack and cheddar cheese, salsa, guacamole,
lettuce and sour cream with your choice of charbroiled chicken, ground beef,
pork or tofu along with a healthy side
of chips.
Steak, Shrimp or Mahi Mahi (and,
as the immortal Dave Barry says…I am NOT making this up) add $8.00.
Okay,
besides the obvious “this is so gross just reading it makes me want to…..” one
wonders (or at least I did), why this entrée is called THE EX-WIFE. And whose “good idea at the time” was it? Was
it the “good idea’ of the person who named it? Or are they referring to the
thought process of the prospective patron who actually orders this massive
remembrance of a prior wife and decides that, regardless of the free t-shirt he
simply cannot finish it? And, more significantly, why not THE EX-HUSBAND? And regardless, did the inventor chose this
combination of ingredients because he had a fat ex-wife? Because she was gross?
Because she would always order the more expensive menu item (8 bucks more for
steak, shrimp or mahi)? Or was it simply because he had a little too many tequila
shots the night he penned the menu.
In
reality, I think it’s a little sexist to call this item THE EX WIFE. Let’s be fair here. As a divorce and family
law attorney who represents husbands and wives,
and, consequently, helps these folks attain the status of “Ex” husband and wife,
I think it is only fair that TWE (it’s shorthand for The Whole Enchilada)
should have a parallel entrée called THE EX HUSBAND. Except
instead of filling a burrito with the aforementioned ingredients, perhaps it
should be filled with “the hundreds of meals made for him, the tons of laundry
washed for him, the several times he forgot her birthday, anniversary, etc.,
and, a whole bunch of other crap that the individual restaurant patron gets to
select from the restaurant’s Ex Bar. Yes, I am kidding, they do not have an ex bar.
In reality, I am sure that many ex husbands could fill their burritos
with an equally unappetizing list of ingredients.
I had
contemplated contacting the company directly to inquire about the choice of
name for its signature kitschy item, but I figured maybe I’d send them a copy
of this and see if they decide to reply.
Still
regardless of the innovation or motivation for this menu item, wouldn’t it be
much nicer if the Ex Wife (or, if they go with my suggestion, Ex Husband) was a
dessert item? I mean, who doesn’t love
dessert.
Monday, September 29, 2014
Are Women Ready for Divorce? Seven Reasons Why They Probably are Not
The first mistake was you married him (or her). The second mistake was you undertook divorce
without preparation.
"Be
prepared!” Wasn’t that the Girl Scouts
or the Boy Scouts motto? I am not sure because my mother, for reasons that
evade me some 50 years later, refused to let me become a Girl Scout.
Nonetheless, she did relentlessly drill into me that nothing substituted for
preparation. Thanks, Mom.
Still,
for every “ounce of prevention” instilled into me, I more often than not see
clients who are not prepared for divorce in any way…economically,
intellectually or emotionally. Not surprisingly, my observations are shared by
many of my fellow family law attorneys.
Divorce lawyer, Rebecca Zung, has authored a book, Breaking Free: A Step-By-Step Divorce Guide to Emotional, Physical and
Spiritual Freedom, that outlines seven BIG mistakes women (and, let’s be
fair, more frequently men, make in the path leading up to and during the
divorce.
In the order that
makes sense, here they are with my spin to them:
- Zero to limited knowledge of family finances: I have actually had many clients who walk in and, not only have no idea of where the money is, but have no clue as to what their spouses earn. This is almost tantamount to the old joke where a woman doesn’t understand how she has no money when she still has checks in her checkbook. (I guess the updated version is “I still have a debit card…how can I have no money.”) Ladies (and Gentlemen) YOU NEED TO KNOW AND YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO KNOW… If your spouse is secretive, ask. Candidly, I think if couples shared more about their finances there would be less divorce.
- Having no money to begin a divorce: Too frequently a spouse has neither a rainy day fund to cover temporary day-to-day living expenses nor funds to begin a divorce proceeding for an initial retainer for an attorney. Again, “fail to plan and plan to fail.” Although you can request that a court award you temporary support and temporary attorney’s fees, first you have to have funds to begin the case. As lawyers we only have our advice and knowledge to “sell” and practicing law is a business. So clients have to be prepared to pay. After all, you wouldn’t expect to fill your cart with groceries, go to the checkout and tell the cashier you have no money and then leave the store. Moreover, even after a motion for temporary support is filed, it could take weeks and even months to get before a judge.
- Trying to “do it yourself”: My favorite line is when a wife says, “My husband told me that I will get nothing from him if I hire a lawyer.” So what’s new…this guy has run the whole marriage and now he thinks he’s going to run the whole divorce. Since most people have not gone through a divorce before, they don’t know what to expect and what their rights and obligations are. That’s why you hire an attorney.
- Acting with your heart and not your head: Of course divorce is emotional, and I expect to see clients angry, sad, downright depressed, confused, and, yes, even vengeful at times (more times than I’d like to acknowledge). That’s another area where lawyers earn their keep (See #3 above). Although, as a “person” I truly sympathize with the havoc my clients go through, when it comes to trying to get the case resolved, two attorneys can remove the emotional aspects of divorce and concentrate on solutions that will help the clients move on with life. I not only encourage, but often suggest that my clients seek the aid of a qualified therapist to get them through these trying times. Rather than see it as a sign of weakness, I believe it is a sign of strength to get through this tough period and make rational decisions in the process.
- Believing Divorce is a Fair and Just Process: It isn’t. Period. So if you think you’re going to get a better deal because your spouse cheated, or you were a devoted wife, forget it. (This swings both ways…if a person is cheated on and makes more money he/she could still be paying alimony at the end). Because there are areas within divorce law where judges have discretion (and enough latitude so that they don’t have their decisions overturned on appeal) your outcome may well depend on the judge’s personal life. If he’s paying alimony he might be gentler on a husband in front of him.
- Reacting to your Husband’s Reaction: Typically once the divorce process begins, even if it is initiated by the wife, after a while husbands usually accept the inevitable and the emotional aspect is removed, or, at least, downplayed. From that “ah ha” moment onward the husband negotiates a business deal. Wives, on the other hand, cannot understand why there is now this cold, callous and calculating individual who no longer wants to discuss things she still feels (and often rightfully so) are important (like the kids…) The sooner a wife can understand, if not accept, that she is in the throes of business negotiations, the sooner she will be in a position of strength.
- A Settlement Too Soon and for Too Little: Although Zung lists this as a final factor, I say this is an “it depends” factor. I have heard people complain that lawyers drag a case out (costing more time and money). Yes, unfortunately, some of my more unscrupulous colleagues may engage in this game, but more often than not, caring, knowledgeable and experienced attorneys know when more time and work is needed on a case, and when the attorney has enough information to help to client make an informed decision. However, listen when your lawyer says you will do better in court. Your spouse (or his attorney) may try to “scare” you into a settlement. If you feel that way, reread numbers 3 through 6.
Yes, the common theme running through
all of these “mistakes” is acting emotionally instead of rationally. Let’s face it; women are hard wired to act
this way. That’s why we have the babies
(or maybe that’s the other way around) and traditionally (note- I said “traditionally”- not always) are the ones
who devoted more time to child rearing- while the husbands were out honing
their negotiating skills for future divorce negotiations.
So the moral of the story is, if you’re
about to divorce or are in the midst of a divorce, remember that old Girls
Scout motto, whether you were a Girl Scout or not, and be prepared. As part of your preparation get someone to
help you remove as much of the emotional aspects as possible…a good lawyer and
a good therapist, not to mention some rational friends, are a good start.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
